皮层听觉诱发电位评估耳聋儿童助听器验配效果的意义

The Application of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Assessment of Hearing Aid Fitting for Hearing-impaired Children

郭倩倩;陈雪清;莫玲燕;孟超;

1:首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科北京市耳鼻咽喉科研究所耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学教育部重点实验室(首都医科大学)

2:北京和睦家医院耳鼻咽喉科

摘要
目的探讨皮层听觉诱发电位(cortical auditory evoked potential,CAEP)在助听器验配效果评估中的应用价值,为临床耳聋儿童听觉言语康复效果评估提供参考。方法 26例语前聋患儿均双耳选配助听器,分别测试患儿助听条件下的CAEP及助听听阈;根据助听后三个刺激声/m/、/g/、/t/在55dB SPL强度下是否全部引出波形将患儿分为A组和B组,全部引出波形的患儿为A组,其余患儿为B组,比较二组的助听听阈。结果 26例患儿CAEP波形引出率为96.15%(25/26),A组(11例)0.25、0.5、1、2、4kHz助听听阈均值分别为32.73±7.54、27.27±5.18、35.00±5.48、35.91±7.35、35.45±4.72dB HL;B组(15例),除1例未引出CAEP外,有9例在65dB SPL强度下全部引出CAEP波形,其0.254kHz各频率助听听阈均值分别为36.11±7.82、35.00±4.33、38.89±6.51、40.00±7.07、43.33±8.66dB HL;有5例在75dB SPL强度下全部引出CAEP波形,其0.254kHz各频率助听听阈均值分别为36.11±7.82、35.00±4.33、38.89±6.51、40.00±7.07、43.33±8.66dB HL;有5例在75dB SPL强度下全部引出CAEP波形,其0.254kHz各频率助听听阈均值分别为44.00±12.94、39.00±7.41、49.00±6.52、44.00±6.52、54.00±11.94dB HL,且A组患儿各刺激声对应频段助听听阈均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。阈值强度下低频声/m/、中频声/g/、高频声/t/的P1波潜伏期均值分别为130.16±24.85、114.80±25.99、122.88±27.05ms,幅值分别为6.58±4.53、6.41±3.97、5.58±3.56μV,相应频段助听听阈分别为34.30±7.69、40.20±8.48、41.40±8.07dB HL,P1波潜伏期与相应频段助听听阈均无显著相关(P>0.05),P1波幅值与相应频段助听听阈呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。结论 CAEP测试可用于评估儿童助听器选配效果,55dB SPL强度下能够引出CAEP波形可作为评估助听器选配效果良好的指标之一。
关键词
皮层听觉诱发电位;助听听阈;助听器;儿童
基金项目(Foundation):
首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2011-1017-01);; 卫生行业科研专项基金(201202001);; 首都市民健康项目培育专项(Z141100002114033);; 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划基金(2009-3-29);; 首都医科大学基础-临床科研合作基金重点项目(12JL12);; 北京市医院管理局临床医学发展专项-2015年度“扬帆”计划临床技术创新项目(XMLX201514)资助
作者
郭倩倩;陈雪清;莫玲燕;孟超;
参考文献

1莫玲燕.小儿听觉电生理测试的临床应用简述[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,05:416.

2 郑芸.保障人工植入助听装置的听力学评估[J].中国医学文摘耳鼻咽喉科学,2009,2:83.

3 阚赪,刘辉,傅新星,等.听觉皮层诱发电位对语后聋人工耳蜗植入效果的评估[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,27:1068.

4 Robert FB,Jos JE,Manuel D.Auditory evoked potentials:basic principles and clinical application[M].New York:Lippincott Williams&Wilkins,2006.495~496.

5 Bauer PW,Sharma A,Martin K,et al.Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2006,132:1133.

6 Sharma A,Dorman MF.Central auditory development in children with cochlear implants:clinical implications[J].Adv Otorhinolaryngol,2006,64:66.

7 Sharma A,Nash A,Dorman M.Cortical development,plasticity and re-organization in children with cochlear implants[J].J Commun Disord,2009,42:272.

8 Dorman MF,Sharma A,Gilley P.Central auditory development:Evidence from CAEP measurements in children fit with cochlear implants[J].Communication Disorders,2007,40:284.

9 Chang HW,Dillon H,Carter L,et al.The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potentials(CAEP)detection and audibility assessed behaviorally in infants with sensorineural hearing loss[J].Int J Audiol,2012,51:663.

10 Cone-Wesson B,Wunderlich J.Auditory evoked potentials from the cortex:audiology applications[J].Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2003,11:372.

11 Golding M,Pearce W,Seymour J,et al.The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials(CAEPs)and functional measures in young infants[J].Journal American Academy Audiology,2007,18:117.

12 Rance G,Cone-Wesson B,Wunderlich J,et al.Speech perception and cortical event related potentials in children with auditory neuropathy[J].Ear Hear,2002,23:239.

13 Alvarenga KF,Amorim RB,Aqostinho-Pesse RS,et al.Speech perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders[J].Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2012,76:1332.

14 Van Dun B,Carter L,Dillon H,et al.Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential(CAEP)detection for hearing-impaired infants in response to short speech sounds[J].Audiol Res,2012,2:65.

15 Chang HW,Dillon H,Carter L,et al.The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential(CAEP)detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss[J].Int J Audiol,2012,51:663.

16 Carter L,Golding M,Dillon H,et al.The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials(CAEPs)using statistical and visual detection techniques[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2010,21:347.

17 韩德民,许时昂.听力学基础与临床[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2005.456~460.

18 Reite M,Adams M,Simon J,et al.Auditory M100component 1:relationship to Heschl’s gyri[J].Brain Res Cogn Brain Res,1994,2:13.

19 Sharma A,Dorman MF,Spahr AJ.A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants:Implications for age of implantation[J].Ear Hear,2002,23:532.

20 Munro KJ,Purdy SC,Ahmed S,et al.Obligatory cortical auditory evoked potential waveform detection and differentiation using a commercially available clinical system:HEARLabTM[J].Ear Hear,2011,32:782.

21 Van Maanen A,Stapells DR.Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses(80versus 40 Hz)and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation inhearing-impaired adults[J].Int J of Audio,2005,44:613.

22 Zhang VW,Ching TYC,Van Buynder,et al.Aided cortical response,speech intelligibility,consonant perception and functional performance of young children using conventional amplification or nonlinear frequency compression[J].International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2014,78:1692.

23 Wunderlich JL,Cone-Wesson BK,Shepherd R.Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children[J].Hearing Research,2006,212:185.

24 Paul W,Bauer MD,Sharma A,et al.Central auditory development in children with bilateral bochlear implants[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2006,132:1133.

本文信息

PDF(115K)

本文作者相关文章

郭倩倩陈雪清莫玲燕孟超