1 Helms J,Weichbold V,Baumann U,et al.Analysis of ceiling effects occurring with speech recognition tests in adult cochlear-implanted patients[J].ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec,2004,66:130.

2 Gifford RH,Shallop JK,Peterson AM.Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects:considerations for cochlear implant programs[J].Audiol Neurootol,2008,13:193.

3 Moog JS,Geers AE.Epilogue:major findings,conclusions and implications for deaf education[J].Ear Hear,2003,24:121S.

4 Snow D,Ertmer D.The development of intonation in young children with cochlear implants:apreliminary study of the influence of age at implantation and length of implant experience[J].Clin Linguist Phon,2009,23:665.

5 Schafer EC,Thibodeau LM.Speech recognition abilities of adults using cochlear implants with FM systems[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2004,15:678.

6 Spahr AJ,Dorman MF,Loiselle LH.Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems:effects of input dynamic range[J].Ear Hear,2007,28:260.

7 Wolfe J,Schafer EC,Heldner B,et al.Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2009,20:409.

8 Whitmal NA,Poissant SF.Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2009,126:2556.

9 Hazrati O,Loizou PC.The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners[J].Int J Audiol,2012,51:437.

10 Duquesnoy AJ,Plomp R.The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise[J].J Acoust Soc Am,1983,73:2166.

11 McAlister PV.The effects of hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise by normal-hearing listeners[J].J Rehabil Res Dev,1990,27:33.

12 Ricketts TA,Hornsby BW.Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit[J].Ear Hear,2003,24:472.

13 Boothroyd A.Hearing aid accessories for adults:The remote FM microphone[J].Ear and Hearing,2004,25:22.

14 Lewis MS,Crandell CC,Valente M,et al.Speech perception in noise:directional microphones versus frequency modulation(FM)systems[J].Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,2004,6:426.

15 Schafer EC,Thibodeau L.Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral,bimodal,and FM-system arrangements[J].American Journal of Audiology,2006,15:114.

16 Wolfe J,Schafer EC.Optimizing the benefit of sound processors coupled to personal FM systems[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2008,19:585.

17 Setha P,Tharapong S.Development of a low cost assistive listening system for hearing-impaired student classroom[J].The Scientific World Journal,2013,2013:787656.

18 Elizabeth MF,Philippe F.Users'perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants[J].International Journal of Audiology,2010,49:44.

19 Thibodeau L.Interfacing FM systems with implantable hearing devices[J].Seminars in Hearing,2010,31:47.

20 Iglehart F.Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms[J].Am J Audiol,2004,13:62.

21 Crandell C,Holmes A,Flexer C,et al.Effects of soundfield FM amplification on the speech recognition of listeners with cochlear implants[J].Journal of Educational Audiology,1998,6:21.

22 Anderson K,Goldstein H,Colodzin L,et al.Benefit of S/N enhancing devices to speech perception of children listening in a typical classroom with hearing aids or a cochlear implant[J].Journal of Educational Audiology,2005,12:14.

23 Boothroyd A,Iglehart F.Experiments with classroom FM amplification[J].Ear and Hearing,1998,19:202.

24 Davies M,Yellon L,Purdy S.Speech-in-noise perception of children using cochlear implants and FM systems[J].Aust N Z J Audiol,2001,23:52.

25 Wolfe J,Schafer EC.Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants[J].Ear and Hearing,2013,34:52.

26 Schafer EC.Selecting the optimal FM system for children with cochlear implants[J].Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood,2008,18:19.

27 Schafer EC,Kleineck M.Improvements in speech recognition performance using cochlear implants and three types of FM systems:a meta-analytic approach[J].Journal of Educational Audiology,2009,15:4.

28 Valente M,Hosford-Dunn H,Roeser RJ.When hearing aids are not enough[M].New York:Thieme Medical Publishers,Inc,Audiology:Treatment,2000.581~600.

29 Schafer EC,Romine D,Musgrave E,et al.Electromagnetic versus electrical coupling of personal frequency modulation(FM)receivers to cochlear implant sound processors[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2013,24:927.

30 Lewis MS,Crandell CC,Valente M,et al.Speech perception in noise:directional microphones versus frequency modulation(FM)systems[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2004,6:426.

31 Schafer E,Thibodeau L.Speech recognition in noise in children with bilateral cochlear implants while listening in bilateral,bimodal input,and FM-system arrangements[J].Am J Audiol,2006,15:114.

32 Thibodeau L.Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids.[J]American Journal of Audiology,2010,19:36.

33 Wolfe J,Schafer EC,John A,et al.The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children[J].Otol Neurotol,2011,32:533.

34 Gifford RH,Revit LJ.Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise:effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2010,21:441.

35 Wolfe J.Cochlear implants and remote microphone technology[J].Seminars in Hearing,2014,3:177.

36 Mulla I,McCracken W.Frequency modulation for preschoolers with hearing loss[J].Seminars in Hearing,2014,3:206.