Praat软件及DSI对改良杓状软骨内收术治疗单侧声带麻痹的疗效评估

Objective Evaluation of Modified Arytenoid Adduction in the Treatment of Unilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis using Praat Software and Dysphonia Severity Index(DSI)

吴红敏;王伟;郑宏良;李玎;李孟;

1:第二军医大学附属长海医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科

摘要
目的探讨Praat软件及嗓音障碍严重程度指数(dysphonin severity index,DSI)对改良杓状软骨内收术治疗单侧声带麻痹疗效评估的意义。方法 65例单侧声带麻痹患者均于患侧行改良杓状软骨内收术。全部病例于手术前及术后3月、12月分别行DSI分析及以Praat软件分析基频(fundamental frequency,F0)、声音强度(intensity)、噪谐比(NHR)、基频微扰[包括:局部基频微扰(jitter local)、局部绝对基频微扰(jitter local absolute)、基频微扰间期系数5(jitter ppq5)]、振幅微扰[包括:局部振幅微扰(shi mmer local)、局部振幅微扰dB(shi mmer localdB)、振幅微扰间期系数5(shi mmer apq5)]。结果术后3月、12月患者F0、NHR、jitter local、jitter local absolute、jitter ppq5、shi mmer local、shi mmer local dB、shi mmer apq5较术前明显下降,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。术后3月、12月声音强度(intensity)分别与术前相比差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术后3月、12月DSI值较术前均有显著提高(均为P<0.05)。术后12月上述所有指标与术后3月相比,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。结论 Praat软件及DSI可客观、有效地评估改良杓状软骨内收术治疗单侧声带麻痹的疗效,该术式治疗单侧声带麻痹远期效果稳定。
关键词
单侧声带麻痹;Praat软件;嗓音障碍严重程度指数;杓状软骨内收术;改良
基金项目(Foundation):
作者
吴红敏;王伟;郑宏良;李玎;李孟;
参考文献

1 Hong KH,Jung KS.Arytenoid appearance and vertical leveldiference between the paralyzed and innervated vocal cords[J].Laryngoscope,2001,l12:227.

2 Su CY,Tsai SP,Chuang HC,et al.Functional significance ofarytenoid adduction with the suture attaching to ricoid carti-lage versus to Thyroid cartilage for unilateral paralytic dyspho-nia[J].Laryngoscope,2005,115:1 752.

3 Woodson GE,Pieerno R,Yeung DY,et al.Arytenoid adduc-tion:controlling vertical position[J].Ann Otol Rhinol Laryn-gol,2000,109:360.

4 Oguz H,Tunc T,Safak MA,et al.Objective voice changes innon-dysphonic Parkinson's disease patients[J].Otolaryngol,2006,35.

5 Wuyts FL,De Bodt MS,Molenberghs G,et al.The dyspho-nia severity index:an objective measure of vocal quality asedon a multiparameter approach[J].Speech Lang Ear Res,2000,43:796.

6 Marieke M,Michael P,Marjan H,et al.The relationship be-tween perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric e-valuation of dysphonia severity[J].J Voice,2006,22:138.

7 Aboras Y,El-banna M,Magraby R,et al.The relationshipbetween subjective self-rating and objective voiceassessmentmeasures[J].Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology,2010,35:34.

8 Van Lierde KM,Claeys S,Bodt MD,et al.Long-term out-come of hyperfunctional voice disorders based on a multipa-rameter approach[J].J Voice,2005,21:179.

9 Shi J,Chen S,Chen D,et al.Modified arytenoid adductionforcancer-related unilateral vocal fold paralysis[J].LaryngolOtol,2011,125:173.

10 Hakkesteegt M.Evaluation of voice disorders,Voice handi-capindex and dysphonia severity index.Ipskamp Drukkers,Enschede[J].Netherland,2009,63:79.

11施剑斌,郑宏良,陈世彩,等.改良杓状软骨内收术治疗单侧声带麻痹[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2010,18:29.

12 Marieke M,Michael P,Marjan H.The applicability of thedysphonia severityindex and the voice handicapindexin eval-uating effects of voice therapy and phonosurgery[J].J Voice,2008,24:199.

13 Yu P,Ouaknine M,Revis J,et,al.Objective voice analysisfor dysphonic patients:a multiparametric protocol ncluding a-coustic and aerodynamic measurements[J].J Voice,2001,15:529.