1 Sarant JZ,Blamey PJ,Dowell RC,et al.Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear i mplants[J]. Ear Hear,2001,22 :18.

2 Rubinstein JT,Wilson BS,Finley CC,et al.Pseudospontane. ous activity : stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical sti mulation[J].Hear Res,1999,127 :108.

3 Hensch TK.Critical period regulation[J].Annu Rev Neuros. ci,2004,27 :549.

4 Kaas J H,Florence SL.Reorganization of sensory and motor systems in adults mammals after injury[ M].In : Kaas J H,edi. tor.The mutable brain.Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Pub. lishers,2001.165 ～242.

5 Irvine DR.Auditory cortical plasticity :doesit provide evidence for cognitive processingin the auditory cortex[J] ? Hear Res, 2007,229 :158.

6 Weinberger NM.Auditory associative memory and representa. tional plasticity in the pri mary auditory cortex[J].Hear Res, 2007,229 :54.

7 Weinberger NM.Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex : a synthesis of two disciplines [J].Learn Mem,2007,14 :1.

8 Kral A,Tillein J,Heid S,et al.Cochlear i mplants :cortical plasticityin congenital deprivation[J].Prog Brain Res,2006, 157 :283.

9 Kral A,Tillein J.Brain plasticity under cochlear i mplant sti mu. lation[J].Adv Otorhinolaryngol,2006,64 :89.

10 Harrison RV,Nagasawa A,Smith DW,et al.Reorganization of auditory cortex after neonatal highfrequency cochlear hearingloss [J].Hearing Research,1991,54 :11.

11 Merzenich MM,Recanzone GH,Jenkins WM,et al.Adap. tive mechanisms in cortical networks underlying cortical con. tributions to learning and nondeclarative memory[J].Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology,1990,55 : 873.

12 Zhang XM,Yang XJ.Regulation of retinal ganglion cell pro. duction by Sonic hedgehog[J].Development,2001,128 : 943.

13 Schoups A,Vogels R,Qian N,et al.Practising orientation identificationi mproves orientation coding in V1 neurons[J]. Nature,2001,412 :549.

14 Plautz EJ,Milliken GW,Nudo RJ.Effects of repetitive mo. tor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys :role of use versus learning[J].Neurobiol Learn Mem,2000,74 :27.

15 Kuhl PK.Early language acquisition : cracking the speechcode[J].Nat Rev Neurosci,2004,5 :831.

16 Tsao FM,Liu HM,Kuhl PK.Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life : a longitudinal study[J].Child Dev,2004,75 :1 067.

17 Ruben RJ.Ati me frame of critical/sensitive periods of lan. guage development[J].Acta Otolaryngol,1997,117 :202.

18 Kral A,Tillein J,Heid S,et al.Postnatal cortical develop. ment in congenital auditory deprivation[J].Cereb Cortex, 2005,15 :552.

19 Kral A,Hart mann R,Tillein J,et al.Delayed maturation and sensitive periods in the auditory cortex[J].Audiol Neu. rootol,2001,6 :346.

20 Syka J.Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss,restoration of function,and duringlearning[J]. Physiol Rev,2002,82 :601.

21 Raggio MW,Schreiner CE.Neuronal responses in cat pri mary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear sti mulation.III.Activa. tion patterns in short.and long.termdeafness[J].J Neu. rophysiol,1999,82 :3506.

22 Tierney TS,Moore DR.Naturally occurring neuron death during postnatal development of the gerbil ventral cochlear nucleus begins at the onset of hearing[J].J Comp Neurol, 1997,387 :421.

23 Mostafapour SP,Del Puerto NM,Rubel EW.bcl.2 Overex. pression eli minates deprivation.induced cell death of brain. stemauditory neurons[J].J Neurosci,2002,22 :4 670.

24 Morest DK,Bohne BA.Noise.induced degeneration in the brain and representation of inner and outer hair cells[J]. Hear Res,1983,9 :145.

25 Russell FA,Moore DR.Effects of unilateral cochlear removal on dendrites in the gerbil medial superior olivary nucleus[J]. Eur J Neurosci,1999,11 :1 379.

26 Niparko JK,Finger PA.Cochlear nucleus cell size changes in the dal matian : model of congenital deafness[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1997,117 :229.

27 Hardie NA,Shepherd RK.Sensorineural hearing loss during development : morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem[J].Hear Res,1999,128 : 147.

28 Klinke R,Kral A,Heid S,et al.Recruit ment of the auditory cortexin congenitally deaf cats by long.termcochlear elec. trosti mulation[J].Science,1999,285 :1 729.

29 Lee DS,Lee JS,Oh SH,et al.Cross.modal plasticity and cochlear i mplants[J].Nature,2001,409 :149.

30 Lee HJ,Giraud AL,Kang E,et al.Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear i mplantation outcome[J].Cereb Cortex, 2007,17 :909.

31 Kral A,Hart mann R,Tillein J,et al.Congenital auditory deprivation reduces synaptic activity within the auditory cor. texin a layer.specific manner[J].Cereb Cortex,2000,10 : 714.

32 Larkum ME,Zhu JJ,Sakmann B.Anewcellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers[J]. Nature,1999,398 :338.

33 Feldmeyer D,Sakmann B.Synaptic efficacy and reliability ofexcitatory connections between the principal neurones of the input (layer 4) and output layer (layer 5) of the neocortex [J].J Physiol,2000,525 Pt 1 :31.

34 Raizada RD,Grossberg S.Towards a theory of thelaminar ar. chitecture of cerebral cortex : computational clues from the visual system[J].Cereb Cortex,2003,13 :100.

35 Klinke R,Hart mann R,Heid S,et al.Plastic changesin the auditory cortex of congenitally deaf cats following cochlear i mplantation[J].Audiol Neurootol,2001,6 :203.

36 Kral A,Hart mann R,Tillein J,et al.Hearing after congeni. tal deafness :central auditory plasticity and sensory depriva. tion[J].Cereb Cortex,2002,12 :797.

37 Fallon JB,Irvine DR,Coco A,et al.Cochlear i mplantation influences the cochleotopic organisation of the pri mary audito. ry cortexin the deafened cat[J].in Thirteenth Annual Mid. Winter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.2007.Denver.

38 Dinse HR,Godde B,Reuter G,et al.Auditory cortical plas. ticity under operation : reorganization of auditory cortex in. duced by electric cochlear sti mulation reveals adaptationto al. tered sensory input statistics[J].Speech Commun,2003,41 :201.

39 Leake PA,Snyder RL,Rebscher SJ,et al.Plasticityin cen. tral representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chro. nic single.vs.two.channel electrical sti mulation by a co. chlear i mplant after neonatal deafness[J].Hear Res,2000, 147 :221.

40 Voll mer M,Leake PA,Beitel RE,et al.Degradation of tem. poral resolutioninthe auditory midbrain after prolonged deaf. ness is reversed by electrical sti mulation of the cochlea[J].J Neurophysiol,2005,93 :3 339.

41 Eggermont JJ,Ponton CW.Auditory.evoked potential stud. ies of cortical maturation in normal hearing and i mplanted children :correlations with changes in structure and speech perception[J].Acta Otolaryngol,2003,123 :249.

42 Sharma A,Dorman MF,Spahr AJ.Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear i m. plantation[J].Neuroreport,2002,13 :1 365.

43 Huttenlocher PR,Dabholkar AS.Regional differences in syn. aptogenesis in human cerebral cortex[J].J Comp Neurol, 1997,387 :167.

44 Sharma A,Martin K,Roland P,et al.P1 latency as a bio. marker for central auditory development in children with hearingi mpairment[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2005,16 :564.

45 Ponton CW,Eggermont JJ.Of kittens and kids :altered corti. cal maturation following profound deafness and cochlear i m. plant use[J].Audiol Neurootol,2001,6 :363.

46 Sharma A,Dorman MF,Kral A.The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with uni. lateral and bilateral cochlear i mplants[J].Hear Res,2005, 203 :134.

47 Sharma A,Dorman MF.Central auditory development in chil. dren with cochlear i mplants : clinical i mplications[J].Adv Otorhinolaryngol,2006,64 :66.

48 Bauer PW,Sharma A,Martin K,et al.Central auditory de.velopment in children with bilateral cochlear i mplants[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2006,132 :1 133.

49 Berthezene Y,Truy E,Morgon A,et al.Auditory cortex ac. tivation in deaf subjects during cochlear electrical sti mulation. Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance i maging[J].In. vest Radiol,1997,32 :297.

50 Giraud AL,Truy E,Frackowiak R.I maging plasticity in co. chlear i mplant patients[J].Audiol Neurootol,2001,6 :381.

51 Hari R,Pelizzone M,Makela JP,et al.Neuromagnetic re. sponses from a deaf subject to sti muli presented through a multichannel cochlear prosthesis[J].Ear Hear,1988,9 : 148.

52 Lazeyras F,Boex C,Sigrist A,et al.Functional MRI of au. ditory cortex activated by multisite electrical sti mulation of the cochlea[J].Neuroi mage,2002,17 :1 010.

53 Green KM,Julyan PJ,Hastings DL,et al.Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear i mplant users : effects of i mplant experience and duration of deafness[J]. Hear Res,2005,205 :184.

54 Naito Y,Hirano S,Honjo I,et al.Sound.induced activa. tion of auditory corticesin cochlear i mplant users with post. and prelingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography[J].Acta Otolaryngol,1997,117 :490.

55 Giraud AL,Price CJ,GrahamJ M,et al.Functional plastici. ty of language.related brain areas after cochleari mplantation [J].Brain,2001,124 :1 307.

56 Dowell RC,Dett man SJ,Hill K,et al.Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear i m. plants :older is not al ways poorer[J].Ann Otol Rhinol Lar. yngol Suppl,2002,189 :97.

57 Dett man SJ,Pinder D,Briggs RJ,et al.Communication de. velopment in children who receive the cochlear i mplant youn. ger than 12 months : risks versus benefits[J].Ear Hear, 2007,28 :11S.

58 Busby PA,Clark GM.Electrode discri mination by early. deafened subjects using the cochlear li mited multiple.elec. trode cochlear i mplant[J].Ear Hear,2000,21 :291.

59 Dawson PW,McKay CM,Busby PA,et al.Electrode dis. cri mination and speech perceptionin young children using co. chlear i mplants[J].Ear Hear,2000,21 :597.

60 Busby PA,Clark GM.Pitch esti mation by early.deafened subjects using a multiple.electrode cochlear i mplant[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2000,107 :547.

61 Busby PA,Clark GM.Gap detection by early.deafened co. chlear.i mplant subjects[J].J Acoust Soc Am,1999,105 :1 841.

62 Busby PA,Tong YC,Clark GM.Psychophysical studies u. sing a multiple.electrode cochlear i mplant in patients who were deafened early in life[J].Audiology,1992,31 :95.

63 Henry BA,McKay CM,McDermott HJ,et al.The relation. ship between speech perception and electrode discri mination in cochlear i mplantees[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2000,108 :1 269.

64 Finney EM,Fine I,Dobkins KR.Visual sti muli activate audi. tory cortexin the deaf[J].Nat Neurosci,2001,4 :1 171.

65 Petitto LA,Zatorre RJ,Gauna K,et al.Speech.like cere. bral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed lan. guages :i mplications for the neural basis of human language [J].Proc Natl Acad Sci US A,2000,97 :13 961.

66 Sadato N,Okada T,Honda M,et al.Cross.modal integra. tion and plastic changes revealed bylip movement,random. dot motion and sign languages in the hearing and deaf[J]. Cereb Cortex,2005,15 :1 113.

67 Nishi mura H,Hashikawa K,Doi K,et al.Sign language' heard' in the auditory cortex[J].Nature,1999,397 :116.

68 Bavelier D,Neville HJ.Cross.modal plasticity : where and how[J] ? Nat Rev Neurosci,2002,3 :443.