高功能孤独症儿童疑问句表达能力的特征研究

A Study on the Characteristics of Interrogative Sentence Expression Ability in High-functioning Autistic Children

任登峰;刘巧云;

1:华东师范大学教育学部康复科学系

摘要
目的 探究高功能孤独症(high-functioning autism, HFA)儿童疑问句表达能力的特征。方法 以22例3~6岁的HFA儿童(HFA组)、22例3~6岁生理年龄匹配的普通儿童(A组)、22例语言年龄匹配的普通儿童(B组)为研究对象,采用情境诱导的实验范式测试并比较HFA儿童与A组和B组儿童的疑问句表达能力。结果 HFA儿童的疑问句产出总量和目标诱导疑问句产出数量显著低于A、B组儿童(P<0.01);HFA儿童自主产出疑问句的数量与A、B组儿童无差异(P>0.05),在一般疑问句的产出上,儿童类型和一般疑问句类型的交互效应不显著(P>0.05);在特殊疑问句的产出上,儿童类型和特殊疑问句类型的交互效应显著(P<0.05)。除了“为什么”、“什么时间”类疑问句外,HFA儿童其余4种疑问句的产出数量均显著低于A、B组(P<0.05)。结论 HFA儿童的疑问句表达能力显著落后于普通儿童,差异主要体现在特殊疑问句的表达;HFA儿童存在疑问句表达灵活性不足的问题。

  【Abstract】Objective To explore the characteristics of interrogative sentence expression ability in children with high-functioning autism (HFA). Methods A total of 22 HFA children aged 3~6 years, 22 physiological age matched normal children aged 3~6 years(group A) , and 22 language age matched normal children (group B) were studied. The interrogative sentence expression ability of HFA children was compared with group A and group B under context-induced experimental design. Results The total amount of interrogative sentences and target-induced questions of HFA children were significantly lower than normal children (P<0.01). There was no difference between HFA children and normal children in the number of self-produced interrogative sentences (P>0.05). In the output of interrogative sentences, the interaction effect between children's types and general interrogative sentences was not significant (P>0.05).In the output of interrogative sentences, the interaction effect between children's types and special interrogative sentences was significant (P<0.05),except “why”and “when", there were differences between HFA children and normal children (P<0.05).Conclusion The interrogative sentence expression ability of HFA children is significantly behind normal children. The difference is mainly reflected in the expression of special interrogative sentences.HFA children are not flexible enough in interrogative sentence expression.

关键词
高功能孤独症;疑问句表达;特征
基金项目(Foundation):
国家语委“十三五”科研规划2018年度科研项目(YB135-81)
作者
任登峰;刘巧云;
参考文献

1 李宇明,陈前瑞.儿童问句系统理解与发生之比较[J].世界汉语教学,1997,42(4):90-98.

2 李宇明,陈前瑞.儿童问句理解的群案与个案的比较研究[J].语言教学与研究,1997,12(4):119-130.

3 缪小春.幼儿对疑问词的理解——幼儿回答特殊疑问句的发展特点[J].心理科学通讯,1986,6(5):3-7.

4 彭小红,宋慧.说汉语儿童疑问句习得个案研究[J].保定学院学报,2011,24(4):92-96.

5 陈敏.语言输入频率与儿童特殊疑问句习得顺序[J].长沙铁道学院学报,2008,9(4):208-210.

6 林青,高晓慧,刘巧云,等.唐氏综合征儿童名词,动词,形容词理解能力特征研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2020,28(1):7-11.

7 Secan KE,Egel AL,Tilley CS.Acquisition,generalization and maintenance of question-answering skills in autistic children[J].Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1989,22(2):181-196.

8 Inoue M,Ogawa M,Fujita T.Acquisition and generalization of "WH"-question answering :verbal behavior of children and youth with autism[J].The Japanese Journal of Special Education,1999,36(4):11-21.

9 李晓燕,周兢.自闭症儿童语言发展研究综述[J].中国特殊教育,2006(12):59-66.

10 孙雯,孙玉梅,雷江华.我国自闭症儿童语言研究的进展与启示[J].绥化学院学报,2017,37(1):78-82.

11 王梅,周梦佳.随班就读自闭症儿童对不同句子类型理解的个案研究[J].绥化学院学报,2013,33(10):89-92.

12 American Psychiatri Association.Autism Spectrum Disorder,Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.5th Edition(DSM-5)[M].Arlington,VA:American Psychiatric Publishing,2013.50-59.

13 Schopler E,Reichler RJ,DeVellis RF,et al.Toward objective classification of childhood autism:childhood autism rating scale (CARS)[J].Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,1980,10(1):91-103.

14 王安,陈德枝,周兢.皮博迪图片词汇测验中文修订版的结构效度分析——基于五省份学前儿童测评结果[J].幼儿教育,2021,5(12):19-23.

15 邹瑾,王立新,项玉,等.自闭症心理理论研究范式的新进展——“思想泡”技术的运用[J].中国特殊教育,2008(2):56-59.

16 王娟,沈秋苹.高功能自闭症儿童的叙事:特征、相关理论及干预策略[J].中国特殊教育,2017 (11):38-43.

本文信息

PDF(1049K)

本文关键词相关文章

高功能孤独症疑问句表达特征

本文作者相关文章

任登峰刘巧云