自主验配与常规验配助听器的短期效果对比研究

Self-adjusted and Routine-fitting Hearing Aids: a Short-term Benefit Comparative Study

郗昕;崔梦茜;周颖;田丽阳;苏俊

1:中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科

2:国家耳鼻咽喉疾病临床医学研究中心

3:聋病教育部重点实验室

4:聋病防治北京市重点实验室

摘要
目的 比较成年听力减退患者常规验配与自主验配助听器后的短期效果差别,探讨非处方自主验配助听器在我国中老年弱听人群中的应用前景。方法 招募20例中度至中重度感音神经性听力减退的55~75岁中老年人,随机分为甲乙两组,每组10例,参与两款助听器验配效果的前瞻性二阶段随机对照研究;一款为由听力师优化调配的常规助听器,另一款为由使用者操控的自主验配助听器。在实验不同阶段交替佩戴常规助听器与自主验配助听器各4周。入组时及第一、二阶段结束时均采用纯音听阈、安静条件下的语句识别率等指标及助听器收益缩略简表(abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit, APHAB)、筛查版老年听力障碍量表(hearing handicap inventory for the elderly-screening version, HHIE-S)等主观指标,比较在未助听、常规验配、自主验配助听三种状态下的结果,评价两类助听器的配戴效果。结果 最终14例患者完成试验。在常规验配与自主验配两类助听器后,受试者的纯音听阈(37.9±12.8、42.6±6.3 dB HL)相较未助听时(49.4±6.8 dB HL)均明显下降(P<0.05),但两类助听方式之间无显著差异(P>0.05);佩戴两类助听器后的语句识别率(65.0%±19.1%、76.1%±13.7%)较未助听(50.4%±13.4%)均显著提升(P<0.01),且两类助听方式间存在显著差异(P<0.01);APHAH量表中交流便利(EC)、混响环境(RV)、嘈杂背景(BN)、烦扰声厌恶(AV)四个亚项及总体收益(GBL),常规验配和自主验配后的得分均明显高于未助听时(P<0.05);HHIE-S量表也到了相同的结果,受试者在配戴两类助听器后听力障碍指数(9.6±8.3、11.4±8.6)明显低于未助听时(17.7±7.7)(P<0.01)。结论 常规助听器与自主验配助听器均可对中老年人提供有效听力补偿和言语识别助益,两类助听器之间无显著差别。但该结论尚需更广地域、更大样本数据的论证。

【Abstract] Objective To compare the one-month effect between routine-fitting hearing aids and self-adjusted hearing aids, and to assess the applicability of self-adjusted hearing aids in elderly people in China. Methods A total of 20 patients aged 55~75 with moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, 10 in each group. Subjects participated in a RCT (randomized controlled trail), prospective, two-stage study. Two kinds of hearing aids were used in this study, one was the routine-fitting hearing aid normally fitted by audiologists, the other was the self-adjusted hearing aid adjusted by customers. All subjects used two kinds of hearing aids alternatively for 4 weeks in two stages of the study. The benefits were evaluated at the time of enrollment and the end of the first and second stages using indicators, such as pure tone average (PTA) of air-conducted threshold, sentence recognition score in quiet, and subjective indicators, such as the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly-screening version (HHIE-S)and abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).Results Fourteen patients completed the study. The aided PTA (37.9± 12.8, 42.6±6.3) was significantly lower than the unaided PTA (49.4±6. 8 dB HL) (P<0. 05),however, the aided PTA was not significantly different between self-adjusted and routin-fitting conditions (P>0.05).The sentence recognition scores in all aided conditions(65.0%±19.1%,76.1%±13.7%) were significantly higher than unaided condition(50.4%±13.4%) (P<0.01),and the score of using self-adjusted hearing aids were significantly higher than that of the routine-fitting hearing aids (P<0.01). The APHAB scores improved significantly (P<0.05) for all subjects in the Global and EC (easy of communication),RV (reverberate conditions),BN (backeround noise) subscales,AV (aversive sounds). According to HHIE-S scores, the handicap degree with hearing aids (9. 6±8.3, 11. 4±8. 6) was improved significantly compared with unaided condition (17.7±7.7) (P<0.01). Conclusion Both of the routine fitting and the self-adjusted hearing aids could enhance auditory sensitivity and speech recognition abilities of elderly people, while no significant difference were shown between these two conditions (P>0.05).Regarding to the potential application prospect of self-adjusted hearing aids, a larger sample-size study covering more regions in China is probably necessary to be conducted.

关键词
助听器;老年人;非处方;验配
基金项目(Foundation):
国家重点研发计划(2020YFC2004005);; 中国残联残疾人辅助器具专项研究课题(2022CDPFA-28)
作者
郗昕;崔梦茜;周颖;田丽阳;苏俊
参考文献

1 胡向阳,郑晓瑛,马芙蓉,等.我国四省听力障碍流行现况调查[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2016,51(11):819-825.

2 刘怡陶,李永新.年龄相关性听力损失的病因和治疗研究进展[J].国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,44(6):343-347.

3 全国防聋治聋技术指导组,等.老年听力损失诊断与干预专家共识(2019)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,54(3):166-173.

4 McCormack A,Fortnum H.Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them[J]?International Journal of Audiology,2013,52(5):360-368.

5 He P,Wen X,Hu XY,et al.Hearing aids acquisition in Chinese older adults with hearing loss[J].American Journal of Public Health Research,2018,108(2):241-247.

6 Contrera KJ,Wallhagen MI,Mamo SK,et al.Hearing loss health care for older adults[J].J Am Board Fam Med,2016,29(3):394-403.

7 Humes Larry E,Rogers Sara E,Quigley Tera M,et al.The effects of service-delivery model and purchase price on hearing-aid outcomes in older adults:a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial[J].American Journal of Audiology,2017,26(1):1-27.

8 Meng Q,Chen J,Zhang C,et al.Editorial:digital hearing healthcare[J].Front Digit Health,2022,4:959761.DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2022.959761

9 周鹏,李赟硕,周颖,等.三种自助纯音测听APP在正常人群中的准确度和便捷性研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020,18(6):1038-1044.

10 余双喜,陈霏,王帅.基于智能手机的数字助听器自主验配系统[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2020,28(6):640-644.

11 罗琼,虞晓颖,沈颖,等.听力宝APP与纯音听力计测听结果的比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2021,29(2):154-157.

12 梁爽,王丽燕,叶小静,等.老年聋患者远程验配助听器效果分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2016,14(6):421-424.

13 周小炫,谢敏,陶静,等.简易智能精神状态检查量表的研究和应用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2016,31(6):694-696.

14 郗昕,黄高扬,冀飞,等.计算机辅助的中文言语测听平台的建立[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2010(4):31-34.

15 徐朝霞,孙晓萍,郭爱萍.言语测听在助听器选配中的作用[N].包头医学院学报,2010,26(6):76-77.

16 Wong LL,Soli SD,Liu S,et al.Development of the Mandarin hearing in noise test (MHINT) [J].Ear & Hearing,2007,28:70-74.

17 胡娴亭,黄治物,陈建勇,等.听力障碍筛查量表用于老年人群听力筛查分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2014,22(3):230-234.

18 郗昕.听力康复效果评估[M].见:周慧芳.主编.听力康复指南.北京,人民卫生出版社,2020.267-297.

19 郗昕.我国助听器、辅听装置技术与验配服务现状及发展趋势[M].见:龙墨,郑晓瑛,卜行宽.主编.《中国听力健康报告(2021)》.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2021.201-215.

20 傅鑫萍,段吉茸,张敏.老年人听力筛查现状分析及其研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2018,16(3):205-208.

21 Graham N,Burke Louise A,Holman Jack A,et al.Covid-19 lockdown affects hearing disability and handicap in diverse ways:a rapid online survey study[J].Ear and Hearing,2020,41(6):1442-1449.

22 王秋菊,冀飞.中国老年性耳聋的研究与干预进展[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2015,14(7):481-483.

本文信息

PDF(309K)

本文关键词相关文章

助听器老年人非处方验配

本文作者相关文章

郗昕崔梦茜周颖田丽阳苏俊