学前儿童普通话声母评估：评估材料的形式及评估方式的影响
Evaluating Initials in Mandarine-speaking Preschool Children: the Impact of Assessment Materials and Forms
徐帅;万勤;黄治物;李蕴
1:上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
2:上海交通大学医学院耳科学研究所
3:上海市儿童听力障碍诊治中心
4:华东师范大学教育学部教育康复学系
摘要【Abstract] Objective To investigate the influence of assessment materials and forms on the evaluation results of initials in Mandarine-speaking children. Methods Forms of assessment materials such as words and sentences and assessment methods such as imitated productions and spontaneous productions were combined into four different assessment tasks. A total of 160 Mandarine-speaking preschool-age children were assessed using self-compiled materials, and the differences in the articulation clarity, the number of phonological process and the time spent in the evaluation were analyzed. Results ① There was no significant difference in different assessment materials and forms on the accuracy of children's initials and the number of phonological processes.② To the contrary, there was sig- nificant difference in evaluation time. Words productions took significantly less time than sentences， and imitated productions took significantly less time than spontaneous productions. Conclusion Evaluating initials in Mandarinespeaking children, the difference of assessment materials and forms have little influence on the accuracy of the evaluation, but have a great influence on the evaluation time. Based on the comprehensive consideration of accuracy and practicality, the test of words imitated is recommended.
关键词基金项目(Foundation):作者参考文献1 Murray E,Iuzzini-Seigel J,Maas E,et al.Differential diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech compared to other speech sound disorders:a systematic review[J].American Journal of Speech-language Pathology,2021,30(1):279-300.
2 Furlong LM,Morris ME,Serry TA,et al.Treating childhood speech sound disorders:current approaches to management by Australian speech-language pathologists[J].Language,Speech,and Hearing Services in Schools,2021,52(2):581-596.
3 黄昭鸣，朱群怡，卢红云.主编.言语治疗学[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社，2017.356-357.
4 Yeh LL,Liu CC.Comparing the informativeness of single-word samples and connected speech samples in assessing speech sound disorders[J].Journal of Speech,Language,and Hearing Research,2021,64(11):4071-4084.
5 McLeod S,Masso S.Screening children’s speech:the impact of imitated elicitation and word position[J].Language,Speech,and Hearing Services in Schools,2019,50(1):71-82.
6 Nelson TL,Mok Z,Eecen KT.Use of transcription when assessing children’s speech:Australian speech-language pathologists’ practices,challenges,and facilitators[J].Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica,2020,72(2):131-142.
7 赵风云，周璇，陈楠，等.功能性构音障碍儿童声母正确率研究[J].中国康复医学杂志，2020(4):415-419.
8 杨梦遥，李锦，王艳霞.构音重读法矫正声母构音不一致[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志，2022,30(1):82-86.
9 张磊，朱群怡，黄昭鸣，等.学龄前聋儿声母发音难度研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志，2012,20(2):102-104.
10 Liu Z,Xu Y,Hsieh F.Coarticulation as synchronized CV co-onset-Parallel evidence from articulation and acoustics[J].Journal of Phonetics,2022,90:101-116.
11 Kim N,Davis BL.Vowel context effects on consonant repetition in early words[J].Journal of Speech,Language,and Hearing Research,2021,64(1):40.
12 McLeod S,Baker E.Speech-langnage pathologists’ practices regarding assessment,analysis,target select,intervention,and service delivery for children with speech sound disorders[J].Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,2014,28(7-8):508-531.
13 DeVeney SL,Peterkin K.Facing a clinical challenge:limited empirical support for toddler speech sound production intervention approaches[J].Language,Speech,and Hearing Services in Schools,2022:53(3):659-674.